Robert Allenby has returned to Australia ready to revive his tour golf career
and silence critics after enduring a year from hell - on course and off.
http:///...lver-838639-001.html
.Allenby on Wednesday revealed hed contemplated quitting a thousand times while
dealing with mental torment of not wanting to be seen in public which
precipitated his steep career slide over the past two years.But the 45-year-old
says hes finally emerged from the darkest period of his life ready to reclaim
full playing rights on the US PGA Tour.Allenby, a 20-year US tour veteran who
has earned a tick under $40 million in America, banked just $33,070 in a dismal
2016 season in which he survived just two cuts in 23 events.The alarming decline
has left him with only conditional US tour status - and likely a maximum of
eight tour events - for 2017.Allenby admits his infamous Hawaii episode in
January last year, when he suspected he was drugged at a bar and reported being
beaten and robbed when blacked out, precipitated his fall due to the image
battering he endured.A local man was later jailed for using Allenbys missing
credit cards.That was by far the lowest point. Just the attention that it
caused, said Allenby on the eve of teeing up in the NSW Open at Stonecutters
Ridge in Sydney..I still stick by my story because detectives and myself know
and even today its the same story.People dont even know that the guys in jail
for what happened to me in Hawaii.Allenby said a story on the Golf Channel about
the Hawaii episode - which he claimed was full or errors - sent him spiralling
towards depression.Not to apologise when they were wrong made it pretty tough,
he said.Made it that I didnt want to be out of the golf course, didnt want to be
seen - didnt want to be seen in public.It really became a very stressful thing
for me and thats when the reality of quitting was really high on the list.Its
only through my wife Kym and my kids and my family that it just pulled me
back.Otherwise I would have gone a year ago. No question.I would have found my
own little hole and just stayed in it for the rest of my life.Allenby was also
shattered at having people I thought were close friends telling him he should no
longer be involved in his own charity - which has earned almost $30 million for
children with cancer.I started that when I was 20 and now Im 45, he said.My
whole reason why I went into it was because my buddy died when he was 13. We
were both the same age.At the end of the day, Ive done a lot more good than
bad.I havent killed anyone. I havent taken drugs - apart from being drugged -
and I really havent done a lot wrong.Were all humans and humans make mistakes.
Whether I made a mistake that was caused by me, I will always own up to it so
youve got to live with it too.Hopefully others will live with it too.Allenby,
who was involved in a public spat with an Australian caddie after sacking him
mid-round last year, described an incident where he was removed from a US casino
this year while reportedly intoxicated as just a farce.That was bullsh-t. Got
dropped straight away, he said.The only player in history to win Australian
golfs Triple crown - the Open, Masters and PGA in the same season - says hes now
at peace with himself and the world.While conceding hed love to prove the
critics wrong, his chief motivation this summer is to win the Australasian tours
Order of Merit to gain exemption into next years British Open and, most
importantly, more tournaments in the US.
http:///...nch-blue-a12006.html
. JOHNS, N.
http:///...o-gs-green-glow.html
. LeBron James and Chris Bosh didnt need any more. Williams scored 11 points in
10 minutes, Alan Anderson scored 17 points, and the Brooklyn Nets finished the
exhibition season with a 108-87 win over the Miami Heat on Friday night.
http:///...black-cool-grey.html
. Louis Blues. Shane Hnidy joins Brian Munz for the broadcast on TSN 1290 Radio
at 7pm ct.Got a question on rule clarification, comments on rule enforcements or
some memorable NHL stories? Kerry wants to answer your emails at cmonref@tsn.ca!
Hi Kerry, I still have a bone to pick with you regarding your officiating during
an Avs and Kings game back in the late 90s. That said, Ive really become a fan
of yours since reading your column! Late in the third period of the game one
between Chicago and Los Angeles, Dave Bolland took a run at Mike Richards who
was behind the net with the puck. Richards was coming around and trying to
stuff the puck home. I watched and rewound and watched the play several times.
Bolland appears to leave his feet, but its hard to tell because he leaned
forward, so well give him the benefit of the doubt on that one. But he
definitely elevates his body in an upward direction, and the principal point of
contact was the head of Mike Richards. In addition, Richards appears to have
been injured on the play. Why was this not at the very least a penalty, and
possibly a suspension? We keep hearing that the league wants to crack down on
shots to the head but there seems to be no consistency. Not only was a penalty
not called, but it appears as of this writing that no suspension will be
forthcoming either. Five years ago I wouldnt be sending this email. It would
have been a good hit and that would be the end of it. But the league has
decided to crack down on hits to the head – unless its the third period of a
playoff game. In your opinion, did the hit warrant a penalty and/or
suspension? John Lord Hi John:Thank you for this well worded and thought
provoking question. The reality is that the elevated hit delivered by Dave
Bolland, and which resulted in Mike Richards head becoming the principal point
of contact, is currently deemed an acceptable hockey hit by virtue of specific
language contained in two relevant rules. The same reasoning and standard of
enforcement almost always carries forward in the supplemental discipline process
as well. To enhance "player safety" I firmly believe the time has come to
readjust the language and thought process on elevated hits where the head of an
opponent receives the majority of the impact. We should not be parsing words as
"upper body injuries" continue to result from these types of hits but instead
tackle the problem head on with a consistent approach. I watched in real-time as
Bolland delivered the hit on Richards. Even prior to the replay being shown I
sent out the following tweet; "Bolland left his feet big time to hit Richards.
Wish that would be called charging." While "big time" was somewhat over
reactive, the replay clearly demonstrated that Bolland elevated his body with
his right skate well off the ice and the toe/tip of his lefft skate blade in
contact with the ice at the instant of impact.
http:///...ack-orange-blue.html.
Bollands elevation, combined with Mike Richards lowered posture to play the puck
resulted in a solid hit to Richards head. If you freeze frame as the two players
meld together in contact both of Bollands skates are clearly off the ice. Rule
41.1 (charging) calls for a minor or major penalty to be assessed on a player
who skates or jumps into an opponent. Historically "skates off the ice" has
fallen into the "jump" portion of this rule and resulted in a penalty. As
elevated hits have been delivered with much more frequency it also became
acceptable for the hitters skates to leave the ice at the moment of contact or
afterward; even as in this case the contact with the ice was with the toe of one
skate blade! As body momentum is moving upward it is often very difficult to
determine the instant a players skates leave the ice and the Referees primary
focus in on the upper extremities of both players. Moving on to rule 48 (illegal
check to the head) we find it describes a hit resulting in contact with an
opponents head where the head is targeted and the principal point of contact is
not permitted. The next statement in the rule; "However, in determining whether
such a hit should have been permitted, the circumstances of the hit, including
whether the opponent put himself in a vulnerable position immediately prior to
or simultaneously with the hit or the head contact on an otherwise legal body
check was avoidable, can be considered" clouds the decision making process for
both the Referee and the Player Safety Committee. This places considerable onus
on the player receiving the hit if he lowers or alters his body position to make
a legitimate play. Mike Richards assumed a lower body posture as he tried to jam
the puck past Corey Crawford on a wrap-around. While there was no need for Dave
Bolland to elevate and check in an upward fashion given his opponents lowered
head position, the parsing of words found in the rule makes it more acceptable
to do so. The hitter more often than not receives a free pass on hits like this
but the end result is often the same - significant contact to the head and a
resulting concussion. John to answer your question directly I want a charging
minor penalty assessed on this play and in all cases where a player leaves his
skates to check up to the head of an opponent. Until the parsing of words is
eliminated it will be inconsistently applied on the ice and in the board room
other than in the most obvious cases like Justin Abdelkaders launch on Toni
Lydman. Forcing players to keep their skates on the ice through a hit can only
help reduce contact to the head. The skates are a great place to focus some
meaningful attention in an effort to crack down on needless head hits.
Cheap NFL Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys China Cheap Jerseys From China Cheap NFL Jerseys Authentic Wholesale Jerseys China
Cheap NFL Jerseys
China NFL Cheap
Jerseys ' ' '