Rs3 includes a diminishing RuneScape playerbase due to mechanics that are clunky and the learning curve. Eliminating a few switch scape makes the endgame appealing to the RuneScape playerbase but also can get rid of some of OSRS gold the learning curve helping newer RuneScape players. It also opens up options for new skill expression because if you no more need something such as flanking or 3 rings and two necklaces, you now have inventory room to research other mechanisms or enable jagex to design more interesting/meaningful options like vuln bombs for those spaces. Just my 2 cents as a pvmer. If you want to get people to PvM, then reducing the quantity of switching is among the least helpful things possible and won't ever get you the results you desire, especially considering the fact that switches aren't required for any material intended at the bottom level.

You get people and curious by providing them meaningful challenges and feedback loops to induce them to acquire better and have that desire to drive themselves to get better. Something hard? Grind away until it's possible to overpower it using stats that are raw. The open-ended nature of RuneScape, while having a great deal of advantages in RuneScape player liberty, also hinders RuneScape player expansion for battle by not supplying meaningful tests to demonstrate the RuneScape participant where they ought to be for combat. In case Jagex wants individuals to actually get down with the essentials of EoC That is bad. That is also why people are on Revolutionbecause they just don't understand and stick with it after the outset of RuneScape game.

By there in endgame, you are too entrenched in poor habits and do not understand what is good or bad if you don't talk to other RuneScape players. If you'd like people to get to RuneScape game, you have to show them a while and test them in their abilities, providing them an endorphin rush and inviting them to push their limits.

Eliminating switches isn't going to fix decreasing population either and I highly doubt it's a variable. It is misleading to say RuneScape's population is declining due to the learning curve and clunky mechanisms, considering we've massive content droughts, bad PR with MTX, and a general lack of excitement throughout the RuneScape playerbase. Brick-wall learning curves don't prevent people from getting into matches if word of mouth is powerful. Dragon Hunter and Warframe are games that display those illustrations perfectly, even if the former did create some QoL adjustments to make it even more mainstream with World, and Dragon Hunter is a series that is notorious for being called"clunky". That's the situation, being slower and super deliberate particularly in comparison to Capcom series Devil May Cry.

Last, tiny switches that are insignificant in the grand scheme of things can be reversed and be used as a point for keeping them in RuneScape match, leaving it for people that want to go the distance and keep at the top 0.1%. I don't believe in taking away things that lower the skill ceiling unless it's overpowered, like Planted Feet (that is hardly any ability when giving you a massive buff) and Spellbook Swap (that does go too far in making Magic too versatile). And more importantly there'll always be some scapegoat for individuals not getting into PvM. It was elitism and group articles. In 2017 onwards it's switches. Whatever the situation, it's some boogeyman debate. Sooner or later, deal with it cheap runescape 3 gold and these people today will need to locate a remedy themselves.